Reality bites. We keep pretending (and the Yellowtards keep being defensive about it) that Jover Laurio’s face should not be made a topic by her critics. Yeah I agree as I’m sure other mature netizens agree too that we should focus on the issues and not on Jover’s looks.
But the REALITY of the media business is different. Humans are very visual. Social media experts emphasize that all the time. To market something or an idea, the face of the marketer matters. So I think the yellowtards are really in bad shape seeing that Jover Laurio is the “face” of yellowtard blogging.
Isip isip naman dyan para manalo sa elections. 😉
I ask a lot of questions…
or maybe they did it in purpose 🙂 they market mediocre policies as similar to her blogposts and “critical observations” and her ugly face as to what her padrinos look-like
They must have severely miscalculated and thought that using a jolog to engage the masses will work. That’s ok if they had a truly diversified portfolio of bloggers who could do both chi chi and bugok across a spectrum of blogging quality. Trouble is they put all their eggs on one basket — Jover Laurio.
Cory is the original jolog 😀